GRACE and GRACE-FO Related Publications (no abstracts)

Sorted by DateSorted by Last Name of First Author

Ground track density considerations on the resolvability of gravity field harmonics in a repeat orbit

Kloko\vcn\'ık, J., Wagner, C. A., Kostelecký, J., and Bezd\vek, A., 2015. Ground track density considerations on the resolvability of gravity field harmonics in a repeat orbit. Advances in Space Research, 56(6):1146–1160, doi:10.1016/j.asr.2015.06.020.

Downloads

from the NASA Astrophysics Data System  • by the DOI System  •

BibTeX

@ARTICLE{2015AdSpR..56.1146K,
       author = {{Kloko{\v{c}}n{\'\i}k}, J. and {Wagner}, C.~A. and {Kosteleck{\'y}}, J. and {Bezd{\v{e}}k}, A.},
        title = "{Ground track density considerations on the resolvability of gravity field harmonics in a repeat orbit}",
      journal = {Advances in Space Research},
     keywords = {Gravity field of the Earth, Resonant/repeat orbit missions, Ground track density, Resolvability, Maximum degree/order limit},
         year = 2015,
        month = sep,
       volume = {56},
       number = {6},
        pages = {1146-1160},
     abstract = "{One of the limiting factors in the determination of global gravity field
        parameters is the spatial sampling, namely during phases when
        the satellite is in an orbit with few revolutions for each
        repeat cycle. This often happens when it is freely passing
        (drifting) through the atmosphere and encountering a fair number
        of such deficient repeat orbits. This research was triggered in
        2004 by the significant but only temporary, 2-3 months long,
        decrease of the accuracy of monthly solutions for the gravity
        field variations derived from GRACE. The reason for the dip was
        the 61/4 resonance in the GRACE orbits in autumn 2004. At this
        resonance, the ground track density dramatically decreased and
        large (mainly longitude) gaps appeared in the data-coverage of
        the globe. The problem of spatial sampling has been studied
        repeatedly (Wagner et al., 2006; Kloko{\v{c}}n{\'\i}k et al.,
        2008; Weigelt et al., 2009) and simple rules have been derived
        to limit the maximum order for unconstrained solutions
        (inversions) for the gravity field parameters or their
        variations from observations of a single satellite. Here we work
        with the latest rule from Weigelt et al. (2013) which
        distinguishes the maximum attainable order according to the
        parity of the two parameters defining the repeat orbit or
        orbital resonance, {\ensuremath{\beta}} the number of nodal
        satellite's revolutions in {\ensuremath{\alpha}} nodal days
        ({\ensuremath{\alpha}}, {\ensuremath{\beta}} co-prime integers,
        the ratio {\ensuremath{\beta}}/{\ensuremath{\alpha}}
        irreducible). This rule, that the resolvable order (in a repeat
        near polar orbit) should be {\ensuremath{\beta}} for odd parity
        ({\ensuremath{\beta}} - {\ensuremath{\alpha}}) and
        {\ensuremath{\beta}}/2 for even parity ({\ensuremath{\beta}} -
        {\ensuremath{\alpha}}) orbits, arose from the discovery that the
        number of distinct and equally spaced equatorial crossings
        (ascending and descending passes) for odd parity
        ({\ensuremath{\beta}} - {\ensuremath{\alpha}}) is
        2{\ensuremath{\beta}} while for even parity orbits it is only
        {\ensuremath{\beta}}. We extend this insight over all achievable
        latitudes and assess the ground track density (or coverage) by
        way of the maximum distances between subsatellite points at
        arbitrary latitude, specifically for the nearly polar (drifting)
        orbits of CHAMP, GRACE, and the repeat tuned GOCE. We
        demonstrate clearly how latitude (and also the orbital
        inclination) is important and affects the choice of an order
        resolution limit. A new rule, compromising between
        {\ensuremath{\beta}} and {\ensuremath{\beta}}/2 for each
        specific repeat orbit, is proposed, based on the average maximum
        distance between subsatellite points over the achievable
        latitudes. Although these findings allow an initial estimate of
        recoverability based solely on the global spatial sampling of
        the ground track, a more refined analysis involving the
        inversion of specific observations is still outstanding.}",
          doi = {10.1016/j.asr.2015.06.020},
       adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015AdSpR..56.1146K},
      adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}
}

Generated by bib2html_grace.pl (written by Patrick Riley modified for this page by Volker Klemann) on Thu Apr 10, 2025 10:40:57

GRACE-FO

Thu Apr 10, F. Flechtner