GRACE and GRACE-FO Related Publications (no abstracts)

Sorted by DateSorted by Last Name of First Author

Modeling ocean-induced rapid Earth rotation variations: an update

Harker, Alexander A., Schindelegger, Michael, Ponte, Rui M., and Salstein, David A., 2021. Modeling ocean-induced rapid Earth rotation variations: an update. Journal of Geodesy, 95(9):110, doi:10.1007/s00190-021-01555-z.

Downloads

from the NASA Astrophysics Data System  • by the DOI System  •

BibTeX

@ARTICLE{2021JGeod..95..110H,
       author = {{Harker}, Alexander A. and {Schindelegger}, Michael and {Ponte}, Rui M. and {Salstein}, David A.},
        title = "{Modeling ocean-induced rapid Earth rotation variations: an update}",
      journal = {Journal of Geodesy},
     keywords = {Earth rotation, Geophysical fluids, Excitation, Ocean bottom pressure},
         year = 2021,
        month = sep,
       volume = {95},
       number = {9},
          eid = {110},
        pages = {110},
     abstract = "{We revisit the problem of modeling the ocean's contribution to rapid,
        non-tidal Earth rotation variations at periods of 2-120 days.
        Estimates of oceanic angular momentum (OAM, 2007-2011) are drawn
        from a suite of established circulation models and new numerical
        simulations, whose finest configuration is on a
        {\ensuremath{\circ}} grid. We show that the OAM product by the
        Earth System Modeling Group at GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam has
        spurious short period variance in its equatorial motion terms,
        rendering the series a poor choice for describing oceanic
        signals in polar motion on time scales of less than
        {\ensuremath{\sim}}2 weeks. Accounting for OAM in rotation
        budgets from other models typically reduces the variance of
        atmosphere-corrected geodetic excitation by
        {\ensuremath{\sim}}54\% for deconvolved polar motion and by
        {\ensuremath{\sim}}60\% for length-of-day. Use of OAM from the
        {\ensuremath{\circ}} model does provide for an additional
        reduction in residual variance such that the combined oceanic-
        atmospheric effect explains as much as 84\% of the polar motion
        excitation at periods < 120 days. Employing statistical analysis
        and bottom pressure changes from daily Gravity Recovery and
        Climate Experiment solutions, we highlight the tendency of ocean
        models run at a 1{\ensuremath{\circ}} grid spacing to
        misrepresent topographically constrained dynamics in some deep
        basins of the Southern Ocean, which has adverse effects on OAM
        estimates taken along the 90{\ensuremath{\circ}} meridian.
        Higher model resolution thus emerges as a sensible target for
        improving the oceanic component in broader efforts of Earth
        system modeling for geodetic purposes.}",
          doi = {10.1007/s00190-021-01555-z},
       adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021JGeod..95..110H},
      adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}
}

Generated by bib2html_grace.pl (written by Patrick Riley modified for this page by Volker Klemann) on Thu Apr 10, 2025 10:40:58

GRACE-FO

Thu Apr 10, F. Flechtner