• Sorted by Date • Sorted by Last Name of First Author •
Pogorelyuk, Leonid, Black, Mason, Belsten, Nicholas, Polini, Eleonora, Hansen, Jonah T., Ireland, Michael, Monnier, John D., and Cahoy, Kerri, 2024. Space interferometer imaging limitations due to Global Positioning System uncertainties and parasitic forces in Low Earth Orbit. Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 10:025004, doi:10.1117/1.JATIS.10.2.025004.
• from the NASA Astrophysics Data System • by the DOI System •
@ARTICLE{2024JATIS..10b5004P,
author = {{Pogorelyuk}, Leonid and {Black}, Mason and {Belsten}, Nicholas and {Polini}, Eleonora and {Hansen}, Jonah T. and {Ireland}, Michael and {Monnier}, John D. and {Cahoy}, Kerri},
title = "{Space interferometer imaging limitations due to Global Positioning System uncertainties and parasitic forces in Low Earth Orbit}",
journal = {Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems},
keywords = {space interferometer, laser guide star, phase retrieval},
year = 2024,
month = apr,
volume = {10},
eid = {025004},
pages = {025004},
abstract = "{Space interferometers could, in principle, exploit the relatively stable
space environment and ease of baseline reconfiguration to
collect measurements beyond the limitations of ground-based
interferometers. In particular, a two-element interferometer
could provide excellent uv-plane coverage over a few tens of low
Earth orbits. One of the challenges for free-flying
interferometers is controlling the optical path distance with
subwavelength accuracies despite the collectors flying up to
hundreds of meters apart. We consider two approaches: an
artificial in-orbit laser guide star (LGS) that provides a phase
reference for the space interferometer and fringe tracking on
the science target itself. The two approaches (LGS versus no
LGS) would require different image processing techniques. In
this work, we explore image processing with LGS phase residuals
due to global positioning system (GPS) uncertainties. We use GPS
uncertainties from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment
Follow-On mission to simulate image retrieval with a 300-m
baseline laser-guided space interferometer. This is done by
fitting the slowly varying phase errors of complex visibility
measurements. We also consider a 40-m baseline interferometer
with visibility(-modulus)-only measurements. In this case, we
simulate the bias in visibility due to fringe tracking in the
presence of parasitic forces acting on the spacecraft. We then
use a modified version of the hybrid input-output phase
retrieval algorithm for image reconstruction. We conclude that
under our optimistic assumptions, both approaches could enable
general imaging of a few large stars even with CubeSats,
although an LGS would significantly improve the best resolution
obtainable.}",
doi = {10.1117/1.JATIS.10.2.025004},
adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024JATIS..10b5004P},
adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}
}
Generated by
bib2html_grace.pl
(written by Patrick Riley
modified for this page by Volker Klemann) on
Mon Dec 15, 2025 18:11:59
GRACE-FO
Mon Dec 15, F. Flechtner![]()