• Sorted by Date • Sorted by Last Name of First Author •
Wang, Changyu, Wang, Qiuyu, Xu, Huan, Rao, Weilong, Sun, Pengchao, Yi, Shuang, Sun, Wenke, and Wei, Dongping, 2025. Investigating Moho depth variations beneath the South American continent using geodetic constraints. Geophysical Journal International, 243(3):ggaf374, doi:10.1093/gji/ggaf374.
• from the NASA Astrophysics Data System • by the DOI System •
@ARTICLE{2025GeoJI.243..374W,
author = {{Wang}, Changyu and {Wang}, Qiuyu and {Xu}, Huan and {Rao}, Weilong and {Sun}, Pengchao and {Yi}, Shuang and {Sun}, Wenke and {Wei}, Dongping},
title = "{Investigating Moho depth variations beneath the South American continent using geodetic constraints}",
journal = {Geophysical Journal International},
keywords = {Satellite geodesy, Time variable gravity, South America, Hydrology, Dynamics: gravity and tectonics},
year = 2025,
month = dec,
volume = {243},
number = {3},
eid = {ggaf374},
pages = {ggaf374},
abstract = "{The South American continent (SAC), a region of pronounced geodynamic
and hydrological activity, exhibits crustal deformation and
gravity field anomalies driven by the interplay of tectonic
forces and surface/subsurface mass redistribution. While
previous studies have mainly focused on gravity changes driven
by terrestrial water storage (TWS), mass variations of the solid
Earth remain inadequately addressed. In this study, we resolve
deep-seated mass transport Gravity Recovery and Climate
Experiment (GRACE) satellite gravimetry, hydrological model
outputs, GPS-derived vertical crustal motions and glacial
isostatic adjustment (GIA) correction. Our results reveal an
internal mass variation of 0.21 {\ensuremath{\pm}} 0.45 cm
yr$^{{\ensuremath{-}}1}$ in equivalent water height (EWH),
independent of surface hydrological contributions. Interpreting
this signal as predominantly driven by crustâmantle boundary
(Moho) displacements, we estimate an average Moho depth uplift
rate of 0.37 {\ensuremath{\pm}} 0.80 cm yr$^{{\ensuremath{-}}1}$
across SAC, based on the crustâmantle density contrast. The Moho
interface depth variations exhibit significant spatial
heterogeneity. Through uncertainty analysis, four distinct
regions (A, B, C and D) are identified: Region A exhibits Moho
uplift and Region B exhibits subsidence, with part contributions
from the isostatic adjustment. Key uncertainties in these
estimates stem from sedimentation effects and the accuracy of
current observations or models. Subsidence in Region C and
uplift in Region D are related to the co-seismic and post-
seismic effects of the 2010 Chile earthquake. These findings
underscore the significance of solid Earth mass flux in active
continental regions and unravel the mechanisms governing
crustâMoho mass redistribution.}",
doi = {10.1093/gji/ggaf374},
adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025GeoJI.243..374W},
adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}
}
Generated by
bib2html_grace.pl
(written by Patrick Riley
modified for this page by Volker Klemann) on
Mon Dec 15, 2025 18:11:59
GRACE-FO
Mon Dec 15, F. Flechtner![]()