• Sorted by Date • Sorted by Last Name of First Author •
Gou, Junyang, Salberg, Arnt–Børre, Kiani Shahvandi, Mostafa, Tourian, Mohammad J., Meyer, Ulrich, Boergens, Eva, Waldeland, Anders U., Velicogna, Isabella, Dahl, Fredrik, Jäggi, Adrian, Schindler, Konrad, and Soja, Benedikt, 2026. Uncertainty Quantification of Satellite–Based Essential Climate Variables Derived from Deep Learning. Surveys in Geophysics, .
• from the NASA Astrophysics Data System • by the DOI System •
@ARTICLE{2026SGeo..tmp...12G,
author = {{Gou}, Junyang and {Salberg}, Arnt-B{\o}rre and {Kiani Shahvandi}, Mostafa and {Tourian}, Mohammad J. and {Meyer}, Ulrich and {Boergens}, Eva and {Waldeland}, Anders U. and {Velicogna}, Isabella and {Dahl}, Fredrik and {J{\"a}ggi}, Adrian and {Schindler}, Konrad and {Soja}, Benedikt},
title = "{Uncertainty Quantification of Satellite-Based Essential Climate Variables Derived from Deep Learning}",
journal = {Surveys in Geophysics},
keywords = {Deep learning, Uncertainty quantification, Essential climate variables, Satellite observations, Snow cover, Terrestrial water storage},
year = 2026,
month = jan,
abstract = "{Accurate uncertainty information associated with essential climate
variables (ECVs) is crucial for reliable climate modeling and
understanding the spatiotemporal evolution of the Earth system.
Recent developments in deep learning have remarkably advanced
the estimation of ECVs with improved accuracy. However, the
quantification of uncertainties associated with outputs of such
deep learning models has yet to be widely adopted. This survey
explores the types of uncertainties associated with ECVs derived
from deep learning methods, including aleatoric (data) and
epistemic (model) uncertainty, and the techniques to quantify
them. The focus is on highlighting the importance of considering
uncertainty associated with inputs in the deep learning models
to account for the dynamic and multifaceted nature of satellite
observations. The survey starts by clarifying the definitions of
aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties and their roles in a
typical satellite observation processing workflow, followed by
bridging the gap between conventional statistical and deep
learning views on uncertainties. Then, we comprehensively review
the existing uncertainty quantification methods for deep
learning algorithms and discuss their strengths and limitations.
A comprehensive literature review about quantifying
uncertainties in the deep learning estimates of ECVs follows the
theoretical survey, covering a wide range of ECVs. The specific
need for modification to fit the requirements from both the
Earth observation side and the deep learning side in such
interdisciplinary tasks is highlighted. We further demonstrate
our findings with two selected ECV examples, snow cover and
terrestrial water storage, to provide clear insights into
different methods by promoting quantitative comparison. In the
end, we summarize our findings and provide perspectives for
future research.}",
doi = {10.1007/s10712-025-09919-2},
adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026SGeo..tmp...12G},
adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}
}
Generated by
bib2html_grace.pl
(written by Patrick Riley
modified for this page by Volker Klemann) on
Fri Apr 10, 2026 11:13:49
GRACE-FO
Fri Apr 10, F. Flechtner![]()